few days ago a poll Frei put first in the second round on Piñera (36.3 for ñata born with an enormous and 35.5 for having so much money I could do with his ñata what I want). The issue is that everything was under the concept of "technical tie", because the result of two falls within what is known as "margin of error for the survey." 
Why are seemingly responsible for an activity, which can work with a margin of error and that, more over, gives air of seriousness to the final result? ... Not a bad vibes with the interviewers, but god man!, I would send monkeys fry if I start to argue that my stick is not necessary for a known margin of error. 
you know I am a journalist. But Imagine me going where my editor, wave, "bring the story here. As there is a 3% false ... It is the margin for error." Or think of a restaurant. Is it fair that the chef appeared and told us that we have eyes, because 2% of your plate is disgusting? ... margin of error, of course. What if a history professor teaches everything right all year long, but finally tells little children that the Pacific War was won by Paraguay? Nothing could claim the parents and guardians, if the stick of this man was subject to unpredictable error.
addition, Case plant a frightening shadow of doubt, because who assures me that the night before delivering the results, pollsters have not been drinking and sending the reel while half the responses tabulated? Total ... What else gives a very badly done? Margin of error, then. I do not know you, but to me or the margin of error has always motivated me suspiciously. For now, nothing could claim Pato Navia if one day he comes home and catches her girlfriend bedridden with other like him. Margin of error, kid. Anyone happens.
0 comments:
Post a Comment