TETRAS. PART 1
One issue is the special appeal where the club had no intervention. It's simple, there is a resolution that the Court majority ruling in favor of the environmental organization linden leaf and NGOs that were presented in an intermediate procedural issue. An issue that was discussed. The MLP appealed to the Court, to bring the matter to the Court of the Nation. And the Court of the Province said no, because it was not a final decision, but intermediate issues, then it goes to the nation.
The club until then, had no intervention. Until last week. Where if we had participation was at the trial itself. Because ultimately the judge of the court Catoggio 25, La Plata, I direct that would "transfer" to the institutions concerned, namely HELP and students. We were notified in case our reply, we present, the presentation is on Friday.
We are already part of the process, which is what NGOs do not want. Remind you that the clubs had not been cited because they were not moving all that was happening in court. The clubs did not participate. Now after this week we have an interest clubs. The process will be lengthy, cumbersome, but we have no braking notification Stadium.
But I say we have to look further and find the best solution for the club.
This is not a defense. It is solving an injunction within the shelter. But with highly technical issues. With votes of Ministers of the Court. The ruling, not that students do not build the stadium. The court ruling majority as interpreted by us, is a ruling which says: Well, let's see what environmental impact is in this building ... will have to put limitations on construction That is, not that students do not build, nor the fault indicates that students pull down what I build ... not ... not black or white, here are highly technical issues.
The question is: What clubs are, in the case of students, are on trial? Yes, now this at trial, will be able to assert their rights.
Do we have to keep building ban? We do not have. The ban is in the pocket to build, let us be clear.
We so far have no notification prohibiting us build ...
I believe that in the course of the year, these organizations ... NGOs, students are also not intended to pull down, or destroy what he did or did not intend to follow ... Maybe some points to be agreed, will come to some agreement on some issues of construction, and well see, we'll see over the course of time if you come to some agreement or ... not. We have a provincial law and where it has complied with local regulations. We are going to move forward. This is not to first page of newspapers.
I stand in the place of the listener ... The court 25 follows the proceedings and the court of 25, a judge may conduct the entire process but can not pass sentence (remember that the court also spoke against 11 MLP). Now the Court has set 25 no prohibition to continue building. There is a part of the file there. Information reached the court to the Court 25 and then see the steps. PART 2
Everyone has their ideas, but internally they are talking about the chance to close the work, x security and others. STUDENTS
also by the Municipal Executive Order, so the stage is in escrow. And the land is and will remain of Students. And for the continuity of the work takes money. As for the debate
people and partners will have to debate about the purpose and the money needed to reach the final.
There is a debate between, and there are some people sincerely q x the club have moved to do. In 2008 there was nothing to make the stadium did not have the necessary precautions. In September 2008 the silver was Piatti pass and more than other sales. They got 6 million U.S. $. There were no accounts or anything. Someone will have to explain, but ... I remember some past presidents in large assemblies spoke very emphatically ... But the outlook was not. The sincerity and the debate will have to be partners, everyone.
The issue is the heritage of the club. And you're the General Section of the Club ...
These opening a debate
strong ... I think it has made a sincere a diff of the benefit of Abadie.
been told it is very difficult to continue.
and Filipa says I finish my term in the field. Independent
... was lucky omen to sell the stadium do not know how this enabled ...
I think the project and costs were modified. Claims football
were creciendo.Tampoco say ... The previous forecast to Abadie is what went wrong. Not if less ambitious ... But there should be more sacrifice. You had to think this is a monumental work and that this "alone" could not be done ... PART 3
Outside I always had a different view of the stadium. We are 3 leaders who come from another stream: Alberto Aste, Luis Prates and me. So I can not talk about organic facts. Today it is aiming to attract resources to close the whole work.
I participate in assemblies and as in all the debates ... Giving opinions. The club will have to say to members: Gentlemen, the situation is this, the situation is esta.No had the chance to talk to Granillo. If there are people working x the city, they are trying any approach. I think all parties have to put a bit and unlock the legal issue. Because I think the most important in this issue Construction of the stadium, not the term, but students stay with the land. STUDENTS owns some valuable land locked in an important place in the city. And the club's future in relation to that place is important. We discuss a lot of work, money etc. ... But the point is this. Without this fight probably the club, had lost the land. And as for the NGO I am optimistic that the issue may eventually be solved.
0 comments:
Post a Comment